Back to all questions

Why Over 70000 Enterprises in Vietnam Have Closed Down and the Big International Brands Have Shifted Some of Their Production Capacity Back to China in 2025?

Introduction

Enterprises in Vietnam faced a turbulent 2024–2025, and many observers describe a crisis of sorts for the country’s broader business ecosystem. In some reports, more than 70,000 enterprises in Vietnam shut their doors or suspended operations as market conditions tightened. For you, a decision-maker or stakeholder in the Vietnamese manufacturing landscape, this isn’t just a statistic—it translates into broken supply chains, lost jobs, and higher risk for your own operations. You might be asking: why did this happen, and what can Enterprises in Vietnam do to survive—and even thrive—when big international brands shift production capacity back to China in 2025? The answer lies in a precise combination of cost realities, geopolitical shifts, and smart, data-driven actions you can take today.

>You’ll find in-depth analysis of the core drivers behind these shifts, including rising energy and labor costs, tightening credit conditions, and the supply-chain fragility that has haunted global manufacturers. You’ll also discover actionable strategies tailored to Enterprises in Vietnam: how to re-evaluate locations, renegotiate supplier terms, and invest in automation and resilience without breaking your budget. Throughout, we’ll keep the focus on practical steps you can implement in 2025 and beyond, with clear metrics to measure progress.

As you read, you’ll see how the big brands’ reallocation to China is not a one-size-fits-all trend; it’s a signal to recalibrate your own business model. We’ll cover why some Enterprises in Vietnam should consider reshoring, nearshoring, or diversifying across Southeast Asia, and why others must optimize within Vietnam’s current framework to stay competitive. The content below uses 2024–2025 data, localization considerations, and real-world, actionable guidance so you can act quickly.

What you’ll learn:
– The primary causes driving closures among Enterprises in Vietnam and how to assess your exposure
– The cost dynamics of maintaining manufacturing in Vietnam versus shifting capacity to China
– Step-by-step methods to build resilience, improve efficiency, and reduce total landed cost
– How to select between staying in Vietnam, re-shoring to China, or diversifying to other Southeast Asian hubs
– Practical tips, pitfalls to avoid, and advanced practices used by seasoned professionals

By the end, you’ll have a clear roadmap to protect and grow your own Enterprise in Vietnam, with concrete steps you can take now. For quick navigation, use the internal links to the “Step-by-Step Implementation Guide” and “Comprehensive Comparison and Options” sections to jump to the details that matter most to you. And if you’re seeking tailored, hands-on support, you can connect with specialists who can align a plan to your specific production profile and location within Vietnam.

Essential Prerequisites and Resources

Before you begin any substantial shift in your production strategy, gather the essentials. For Enterprises in Vietnam, having precise data, the right tools, and a pragmatic budget plan can make the difference between a costly misstep and a durable competitive advantage. Below is a detailed checklist of prerequisites and resources to ground your planning in 2025 realities.

  • Data and analytics – Access to up-to-date cost data, supplier performance metrics, and market demand signals. Use a centralized data repository (ERP or cloud-based data lake) to track labor, energy, materials, logistics, and duty costs across potential locations.
  • Cost-of-ownership model – Develop a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) model that captures all variables: input costs, capital expenditure (CapEx), operating expenditure (OpEx), currency risk, and tax incentives. For Enterprises in Vietnam, include local electricity tariffs, wage trends, and port handling fees.
  • Supply-chain mapping – Map critical suppliers, logistics corridors, and inventory buffers. Identify single points of failure and diversify where feasible to reduce risk for Enterprises in Vietnam.
  • Location analytics – Compare Ho Chi Minh City, Hanoi, Da Nang, and industrial parks in southern and central regions. Include factors like transport access, industrial policy incentives, and proximity to target markets for Enterprises in Vietnam.
  • Automation and technology readiness – Assess what automation, robotics, or digital twins could lower unit costs or improve quality for Enterprises in Vietnam. Build a phased plan with ROI estimates.
  • Financial plan – Prepare a funding strategy that accounts for currency exposure, working capital needs, and potential government subsidies or export incentives available in Vietnam or the region for Enterprises in Vietnam.
  • Regulatory and risk awareness – Stay current on trade policy changes, labeling and compliance, environmental rules, and labor standards that affect production in Vietnam and neighboring countries.
  • Time and skills – Expect a multi-month horizon for significant reconfiguration. The right mix of in-house expertise and external advisory support accelerates results for Enterprises in Vietnam.
  • Helpful resources
    • World Bank: Vietnam overview and economy updates
    • IMF: Vietnam country information and policy notes
    • Vietnam General Statistics Office (GSO): Official data and trends
    • Industry associations and regional chambers for supplier ecosystems
  • Links for further reading
    World Bank – Vietnam Overview,
    IMF – Vietnam,
    GSO – Vietnam Data,
    Custom clothing manufacturing contact
  • Internal linking tip: See our Step-by-Step Implementation Guide for a practical workflow, and consult the Comparison and Options section to decide on the best path for your Enterprise in Vietnam.

Comprehensive Comparison and Options

When you evaluate options for your Enterprise in Vietnam, you must weigh cost, time, and risk. Below we compare common routes: optimize and stay in Vietnam with automation; re-shore some production to China; diversify manufacturing across Asia; and nearshore to regional hubs. The goal is to help Enterprises in Vietnam make a data-driven choice that reduces total risk while preserving or growing output. The table summarizes key trade-offs for 2025 decisions, followed by a narrative that explains the nuances for Enterprises in Vietnam.

OptionProsConsEstimated CapExTime to implementBest for
1) Optimize and expand within Vietnam– Leverages existing地 workforce; reduces risk of disruption
– Access to local incentives and export programs
– Easier alignment with Vietnamese regulations
– Requires upfront automation investment
– Energy and logistics costs may rise; skill gaps
US$5–20 million (depending on scale and automation level)6–24 months to deploy major linesEnterprises in Vietnam seeking continuity with improvement; risk-averse buyers
2) Re-shore to China (production capacity back to China)– Lower unit labor and scale advantages for mass production
– Strong supplier ecosystems and logistics
– Longer and sometimes volatile supply chains to global markets
– Political and regulatory exposure changes
US$10–50 million (depending on plant size and relocation complexity)12–36 months (planning, permitting, and relocation)High-volume, time-sensitive products where cost per unit is critical
3) Diversify across Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Bangladesh)– Risk is spread; proximity to growing regional markets
– Access to various trade agreements
– Management complexity; currency and cultural differences
– Requires new supplier qualification
US$3–40 million per new site (varies by country and scale)9–30 months per siteLong-tail product lines and mixed markets needing regional resilience
4) Nearshore/Regional hubs (near Vietnam or ASEAN peers)– Shorter transport times to Asia-Pacific markets
– Faster response and collaboration with customers
– Higher internal costs in some locations; regulatory gapsUS$8–25 million depending on site and automation6–18 monthsProjects requiring shorter lead times and diversified exposure

For Enterprises in Vietnam evaluating these options, the focus should be on total cost of ownership, not just unit costs. The decision depends on product type, volume, lead times, and how comfortable you are with currency risk. If you want tailored modeling, use your own data sets to compare scenarios across a multi-year horizon. You can also consult external benchmarks from global manufacturers who have faced similar cross-border decisions. For Enterprises in Vietnam, the key is to balance resilience with cost efficiency, keeping Vietnam as a core base while selectively leveraging regional capabilities.

Internal note: If you’re seeking a structured plan, jump to the Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to begin a practical, stepwise rollout. For a side-by-side view of approaches, refer to the Implementation Guide and the detailed table above.

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide

  1. Step 1 — Define strategic objective and scope

    Clarify what you want to achieve for your Enterprise in Vietnam. Do you aim to reduce landed cost by 10–20%, shorten lead times, or diversify supplier risk? Write a one-page objective and a 12-month target plan. For Enterprises in Vietnam, anchoring goals to concrete local metrics—such as energy intensity per unit produced in a given plant—helps translate strategy into action.

    Tip: Document non-negotiables (compliance standards, quality thresholds, and delivery commitments). This becomes the benchmark for all future decisions.

  2. Step 2 — Build a robust total cost of ownership model

    Develop a TCO model that captures all cost drivers: labor, utilities, maintenance, freight, duties, depreciation, tax incentives, and currency risk. For Enterprises in Vietnam, include local incentives offered by industrial zones and export processing zones in your calculations. Use scenario analyses (base, optimistic, pessimistic) to understand upside and downside risk.

    Important: Decide which costs to inventory on the balance sheet and which to expense. Ambiguity here skews decisions for Enterprises in Vietnam.

  3. Step 3 — Map and validate supply chain criticality

    List all key suppliers, sub-suppliers, and logistics partners. Assess concentration risk for each tier. For Enterprises in Vietnam, identify alternative suppliers within Vietnam and nearby ASEAN markets to reduce single points of failure.

    Troubleshooting: If a top supplier is sole-sourced, run a dual-sourcing pilot with a backup supplier in an adjacent market within 60–90 days.

  4. Step 4 — Conduct location and facility readiness assessment

    Evaluate plant locations (e.g., Ho Chi Minh City vs. Hanoi vs. Da Nang) for labor availability, energy reliability, water supply, and logistics access. Create a decision matrix scoring each site against your key requirements for Enterprises in Vietnam.

    Warning: Don’t ignore energy costs and grid reliability. A single local outage can derail a critical production line for Enterprises in Vietnam.

  5. Step 5 — Assess automation and process optimization options

    Inventory automation candidates by value stream. Prioritize lines with high cycle times or quality risk. Build a phased automation plan with CAPEX, OPEX, and expected payback (usually 18–36 months). For Enterprises in Vietnam, look for local vendors and technology partners who understand regional constraints, including power stability and maintenance.

    Tip: Start with pilot lines to validate ROI before scaling to full capacity.

  6. Step 6 — Reform supplier contracts and risk controls

    Negotiate long-term supply agreements with clear SLAs, quality metrics, and currency provisions. Build a supplier risk dashboard and rotate suppliers to maintain competitive pricing. For Enterprises in Vietnam, incorporate performance-linked incentives and penalties to align behavior with your cost and quality goals.

    Pro TIP: Use performance data to lower total cost per unit over time by strengthening reliability.

  7. Step 7 — Develop a pilot and learn plan

    Run a controlled pilot in one facility or product line to test the chosen strategy. Track key indicators: defect rate, on-time delivery, energy intensity, and labor productivity. For Enterprises in Vietnam, pilot in a regional area with good logistics coverage and a stable workforce.

    Warning: Avoid over-committing to a single approach in the pilot. Keep an exit plan if metrics don’t meet thresholds.

  8. Step 8 — Scale with governance and change management

    Implement the proven changes across other lines or sites with a clear governance model. Build a cross-functional team to oversee the rollout. For Enterprises in Vietnam, invest in upskilling the local workforce to handle new automation and compliance requirements.

    Tip: Schedule quarterly reviews to adjust the plan based on market conditions and new data about Enterprises in Vietnam.

  9. Step 9 — Monitor performance and refine

    Establish KPIs such as total landed cost per unit, yield rate, energy usage per unit, and supplier lead times. Use dashboards that stakeholders can access in real time. For Enterprises in Vietnam, maintain transparency with your teams and suppliers to sustain improvement momentum.

  10. Step 10 — Scenario planning and contingency readiness

    Maintain contingency stock, multi-location sourcing, and backup transport options. Regularly rehearse disruption scenarios and update response playbooks. For Enterprises in Vietnam, regularly refresh currency risk assumptions and adjust hedging strategies as needed.

Common Mistakes and Expert Pro Tips

Mistake 1 — Underestimating total landed costs

Relying on unit costs alone hides hidden expenses such as energy, freight, duties, and currency swings. For Enterprises in Vietnam, neglecting these factors leads to expensive miscalculations that erase any perceived savings from relocation to China or diversification in other hubs.

Expert tip: Build a dynamic cost model that updates monthly and includes scenario volatility related to global demand, transport costs, and policy changes in Vietnam and neighboring markets.

Mistake 2 — Over-optimistic timelines

Leaders often misjudge how long it takes to retool a plant, retrain staff, and qualify new suppliers. For Enterprises in Vietnam, delays can erode customer trust and inflate costs.

Expert tip: Pad schedules with 20–30% buffers. Validate each milestone with objective criteria before proceeding.

Mistake 3 — Ignoring currency and macro risk

When moving capacity or diversifying across markets, currency moves can swing costs. Enterprises in Vietnam must monitor USD/VND or other relevant currency pairs and hedge where appropriate.

Expert tip: Use multi-currency procurement and contract clauses to stabilize margins for Enterprise in Vietnam.

Mistake 4 — Not engaging local talent and regulatory realities

Jumping straight to automation or relocation ignores local labor laws, training needs, and cultural factors that influence productivity in Enterprises in Vietnam.

Expert tip: Invest in local leadership development and ongoing compliance programs tailored for Vietnamese workers.

Mistake 5 — Underinvesting in automation

Underinvesting in automation can delay ROI and leave you exposed to rising labor costs, especially for textile and apparel segments where brand-led demand remains strong in 2025.

Expert tip: Start with modular automation that can expand incrementally as demand grows, keeping risk low for Enterprises in Vietnam.

Mistake 6 — Over-concentration on a single supplier base

Single-sourcing increases risk from supply chain disruptions. For Enterprises in Vietnam, diversify suppliers regionally to keep production resilient.

Mistake 7 — Inadequate change management

Technology and process changes require people, not just machines. Poor buy-in undermines productivity gains for Enterprises in Vietnam.

Expert tip: Create a structured change-management plan with clear communication, training, and incentives.

Mistake 8 — Ignoring sustainability and stakeholder expectations

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns increasingly influence brand partnerships. Enterprises in Vietnam that neglect sustainability suffer competitive disadvantage.

Expert tip: Integrate energy efficiency, waste reduction, and ethical labor practices into the core ROI calculation.

Advanced Techniques and Best Practices

For experienced users, the next level of optimization combines digital tools with strategic resilience. In 2025, Industry 4.0 concepts, digital twins, and advanced analytics help Enterprises in Vietnam achieve predictable, scalable outcomes. You should consider these best practices to push your operations beyond basic optimization.

  • Digital twins and simulations to stress-test production lines before committing CapEx
  • Real-time supply chain visibility leveraging IoT, ERP integration, and cloud analytics
  • Supplier risk scoring that factors political, regulatory, and currency risk
  • Energy intelligence and demand-response programs to stabilize costs
  • ESG integration, including cleaner energy sourcing and ethical labor programs
  • Regional sourcing strategies that leverage ASEAN-wide trade agreements to maximize duty benefits

In practice, Enterprises in Vietnam that combine these advanced techniques with a deliberate, staged approach tend to outperform peers. As brands shift capacity, the most resilient Enterprises in Vietnam become those that can rapidly adjust mix, automate where sensible, and maintain robust supplier networks across the region. If you pursue these methods, you can improve product quality, shorten lead times, and protect margins while maintaining a strong local footprint in Vietnam.

Conclusion

The volatility seen in 2024–2025 has exposed vulnerabilities in many Enterprises in Vietnam, especially those with heavy exposure to cost-sensitive, high-volume manufacturing. Yet this disruption also reveals a path to resilience. By understanding the drivers behind the closures and the shifts of large international brands back to China, you can craft a plan that strengthens your enterprise’s position. The most successful Enterprises in Vietnam embrace a balanced strategy: optimize operations where you are, selectively reallocate capacity when the math makes sense, and diversify across regional hubs to mitigate risk. This is not merely about surviving a challenging period; it’s about building a more robust, flexible, and future-ready manufacturing model for Enterprises in Vietnam that can outpace competitors.

To take action now, review your cost structures, map critical suppliers, and run a scenario exercise using the Step-by-Step Implementation Guide. If you’re seeking tailored guidance or a concrete partner to help implement a custom clothing manufacturing solution, we invite you to connect with our team. Contact us for a customized plan that aligns with your production goals in Vietnam and beyond: https://etongarment.com/contact_us_for_custom_clothing/. Your enterprise should not wait to adapt—start today and command measurable improvements in efficiency, resilience, and growth.

Internal resources to consider as you move forward:
– See the Comprehensive Comparison and Options section to decide between optimizing in Vietnam or diversifying across ASEAN
– Consult the Step-by-Step Implementation Guide for a practical execution path
– Explore external data from World Bank and IMF to stay aligned with macro trends affecting Enterprises in Vietnam

Take action now to ensure your Enterprise in Vietnam remains competitive in 2025 and beyond. The clock is ticking, and the best time to adapt was yesterday—the next-best time is today.