Back to all questions

How does the CLO value measure the warmth of insulation?

Introduction

You want to understand how warmth is measured when you talk about insulation, especially in textiles and apparel. The term CLO value often appears in product specs, but you may be unsure what it really means for comfort, fit, and performance. In practice, the CLO value is a practical yardstick that helps you compare how much insulation a fabric or clothing ensemble provides in typical living conditions. It’s not a single number you can apply to every climate, yet it is a powerful tool when you design garments, select fabrics, or assess insulation for outdoor wear, sleep gear, or workwear. If you’ve ever felt chilly indoors in winter or overheated in a heavy coat during a mild day, you’re tasting the relevance of CLO value in real life.

In 2024 and 2025, researchers and manufacturers increasingly use the CLO value to bridge the gap between lab data and field performance. You’ll learn how the CLO value is defined, what it represents in terms of thermal resistance, and how to use CLO value to guide decisions—from fabric selection to layering systems. You’ll also discover common misconceptions, such as confusing CLO with other warmth metrics or assuming a higher CLO value automatically means perfect warmth in every scenario. With expert guidance, you’ll gain actionable steps to choose materials, estimate warmth, and validate performance in real-world conditions. The CLO value is not just a number—it’s a practical, actionable framework for warmth.

By the end of this guide, you’ll know precisely how to interpret the CLO value, how it relates to your design goals, and how to apply it for different climates and activities. You’ll also see how to communicate CLO value clearly to customers or production partners. This article walks you through essential prerequisites, a side-by-side comparison of methods, a step-by-step implementation guide, and advanced practices you can apply in 2025 to improve warmth while managing weight, cost, and comfort. Ready to turn CLO value into better warmth decisions? Here’s what you’ll learn in this deep dive.

Essential Prerequisites and Resources

  • Understanding the CLO value concept: A basic grasp of what 1 CLO represents (approximately 0.155 m²K/W of thermal resistance for clothing) and how it translates to warmth in typical comfort conditions. This foundation helps you compare fabrics, layers, and ensembles consistently. Tip: review the standard definitions and examples to avoid misinterpreting CLO as a direct heat output metric.
  • Key measurement references: Access data on fabric insulation from reputable references such as Clo (clothing) and Clothing insulation. These sources explain how CLO values are derived and used in practice. Use these as starting points for baseline fabric profiles.
  • Measurement tools and equipment: a micrometer or thickness gauge, a surface thermometer, and access to a thermal manikin or predictive modeling software for more precise CLO assessments. Even simple layering tests can yield useful CLO estimates if conducted consistently.
  • Reference data and standards: obtain ISO/ASTM style references for clothing insulation testing and interpretation. If you’re involved in production, you’ll want to align with analytical methods and validation procedures to ensure CLO value consistency across batches. Recommended starting point: ISO 9920–style guidance where available.
  • Materials and fabrics: gather representative fabrics you plan to use—underlayers, mid-layers, outer shells, and accessories. Note density, fiber type, weave, and finish, all of which affect warmth per CLO value. Avoid assuming similar warmth from fabrics with similar appearance.
  • Budget considerations: CLO testing and manikin-based validation can range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per project, depending on depth and lab access. Plan for a phased approach: baseline CLO data first, followed by prototyping and field testing. Invest in higher fidelity testing if you’re designing premium outerwear.
  • Time requirements and skill level: expect a few weeks for setup, baseline data collection, and initial CLO calculations if you’re working from scratch. If you partner with a textile lab or contract manufacturer, you can accelerate to a few days for tested samples. Develop a simple workflow first, then scale up.
  • Skills to develop or partner with: fabric science basics, human thermoregulation concepts, data interpretation, and clear communication of warmth metrics to non-technical stakeholders. Consider collaborating with a lab technician or a textile engineer for robust results.
  • Helpful resources and links:

Comprehensive Comparison and Options

When you compare methods to evaluate warmth using the CLO value, you’ll find several practical approaches. Each method has its own balance of accuracy, cost, and speed. Below is a concise comparison of common options you can choose from, along with their strengths and trade-offs. This helps you decide which path best fits your project—whether you’re designing a new line of winter jackets, optimizing base layers for heat retention, or assessing energy efficiency in uniform programs.

OptionWhat it measuresProsConsTypical CLO rangeTime to implementEstimated cost
A. Pre-determined CLO data from published fabric specsFabric-level CLO values from existing datasetsLow cost, fast, good for initial screeningMay not reflect real layering or fit; climate variance not captured0.1–0.6 for common fabrics; up to ~2.0 for heavy outerwearhours to daysLow
B. Thermal manikin lab testing of ensemblesActual ensemble warmth under controlled conditionsHigh accuracy; accounts for layering, fit, movementRequires access to a lab; longer lead timesVaries by ensemble; typical office wear ~0.5–0.8 clo; winter gear 1.5–2.5 clo1–4 weeks depending on availabilityMedium–High
C. Predictive modeling from material propertiesIn silico CLO estimates from fiber, weave, and finish dataLow physical testing cost; rapid iterationDepends on model accuracy; validation required0.4–1.2 clo typical for mid-layers in modelsDays to weeksMedium
D. Field wear-testing with user feedbackReal-world warmth responses from end usersPractical insights; good for consumer productsSubjective; data variability; longer collection timeBroad range; often used for product refinementWeeks to monthsLow–Medium

Note: CLO value is a standardization concept originally developed for clothing insulation. It helps you compare warmth between fabrics and layers, but real-world performance also depends on fit, movement, moisture, and climate. When you plan manufacturing or product development, combine CLO-based estimates with practical testing for best results. For more technical background, see our referenced resources and the related CLO literature in 2024–2025.

Incorporate a mix of methods to validate your CLO value assessments. If you’re coordinating with a manufacturing partner in China or another region, you can leverage their lab capabilities for CLO testing and then audit results with your own field tests. For example, you might use pre-existing CLO data for initial design decisions, then confirm your final ensembles with a manikin test or field trials. This approach reduces risk and accelerates time to market while keeping warmth goals clear.

Internal note: If you want a deeper dive into CLO value comparisons tailored to your product line, see our internal guide on CLO-based design decisions. You can also explore resources in our internal tools hub for fabric science and warmth optimization to support ongoing development.

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide

Follow these steps to translate the CLO value concept into concrete design, testing, and production workflows. Each major step includes specific actions, measurements, and timelines so you can track progress and adjust quickly. The goal is to build warmth confidently while controlling weight, bulk, and cost. Keep CLO value in mind as you plan materials, layering, and testing strategies.

Step 1: Define your warmth target and use-case in CLO terms

  1. Specify environment and activity: indoor office, outdoor winter sports, or military use. Note temperature, humidity, wind, and expected activity level. For example, you might target a comfort CLO value around 0.5–0.8 for office layering in 20–22°C with 40–60% RH, moving to 1.5–2.0 CLO for extreme cold outerwear.
  2. Set a baseline CLO target: translate climate and activity into a CLO range. A typical office outfit sits near 0.5–0.8 CLO, while a heavy parka may exceed 2.0 CLO. Document your target per garment layer for consistency.
  3. Align with wearer’s expectations: consider moisture management and breathability. A higher CLO in a moist environment can trap sweat, reducing comfort. Plan layering to balance warmth and moisture transport.

Step 2: Gather materials and define fabric profiles

  1. Collect representative fabrics for underlayers, mid-layers, and shells. Record fiber type, weave, thickness, weight (g/m²), and finish. These values feed CLO estimates.
  2. Document fabric properties: porosity, air permeability, and moisture wicking influence warmth and comfort. High air-trapping fabrics may increase CLO, but limit breathability.
  3. Prepare sample sets of at least 3–5 fabric combinations to test different warmth outcomes. Include a baseline (naked or minimal clothing) reference for CALC CLO comparisons.

Step 3: Establish measurement protocol and baseline

  1. Decide measurement method: use published CLO data as a starting point or perform a simple lab test with a thermal manikin if available. For quick estimates, rely on established CLO ranges tied to fabric classes.
  2. Set standard conditions: consider 21°C, ~50% RH, and no wind for initial testing. Note that real-world variability will occur, so plan field checks later.
  3. Record baseline values for each fabric and layer, including fit and alignment with the body to reflect true warmth estimates.

Step 4: Calculate CLO estimates for each fabric and layer

  1. Convert data to CLO terms: use known guidelines where 1 CLO ≈ 0.155 m²K/W. If you have R-values or thermal resistance per fabric, convert to CLO with the standard conversion.
  2. Aggregate layer CLO: sum the CLO values of individual layers but adjust for air gaps and movement. A looser fit can reduce effective warmth due to convective losses, while tight fits may increase perceived warmth by minimizing air flow.
  3. Account for moisture: moisture increases heat transfer; damp fabrics typically reduce effective CLO value. Include a moisture factor in your total CLO estimate.

Step 5: Build and test representative ensembles

  1. Assemble 3–5 ensembles that reflect your target CLO values (e.g., light, standard, and heavy winter setups).
  2. Document fit and layering: how the garments sit, where air is trapped, and where mobility might affect warmth. Record subjective comfort notes alongside CLO estimates.
  3. Perform quick wear tests in a controlled environment and note any deviations from predicted warmth within 15–20 minutes of wear.

Step 6: Validate with field tests or predictive models

  1. Choose a validation approach: lab-based manikin testing for accuracy or field testing with volunteers for practical feedback.
  2. Analyze results: compare measured CLO with predicted CLO from Step 4. Investigate discrepancies due to fit, moisture, or air leakage.
  3. Iterate: adjust fabrics, weaves, or layering to converge on the target CLO value across real-world conditions.

Step 7: Document results and prepare specifications for production

  1. Prepare a CLO-based spec sheet for each garment or ensemble, including target CLO, allowed variance, and recommended size-and-fit notes.
  2. Set quality gates: define acceptable CLO tolerance ranges for each product class and season. This ensures consistent warmth performance across batches.
  3. Plan for scale: translate CLO targets into fabric orders, finishing processes, and testing plans for mass production. Coordinate with your manufacturing partner to align on measurement methods and data sharing. Internal tip: include a CLO-focused checklist in your supplier brief.

Step 8: Monitor performance and adjust for 2025 trends

  1. Track returns and feedback: collect data on warmth satisfaction, moisture handling, and perceived comfort. Use this to refine CLO targets for upcoming lines.
  2. Incorporate innovations: explore lighter weights, high-loft fabrics, and breathable membranes to improve warmth per CLO value without adding bulk.
  3. Update documentation: maintain an up-to-date CLO database for future products and internal training. Tip: schedule quarterly CLO reviews with product teams.

Step 9: Troubleshooting and optimization tips

  1. If warmth falls short: check layer fit, reduce air gaps, and consider adding a mid-layer with higher CLO value. Small fabric changes can meaningfully affect total CLO.
  2. If warmth is excessive: allow better moisture transport and adjust to lighter layers. Ensure the outer shell doesn’t trap sweat, which reduces perceived warmth over time.
  3. If measurement variance is high: standardize testing conditions, recheck calibration, and verify that you’re testing ensembles rather than single fabrics alone.

Throughout these steps, keep CLO value in view as your guiding metric. It helps you quantify warmth decisions across design, testing, and production. For ongoing success, collaborate with a partner who can support CLO testing and provide practical manufacturing insights. In 2025, combining CLO value with real-world wear data yields superior warmth, comfort, and product satisfaction.

Common Mistakes and Expert Pro Tips

Mistake 1: Treating CLO as a universal heat output metric

Rationale: CLO is a standardized measure of insulation for clothing, not a direct heat yield. Do not confuse CLO with watts or thermal power. Solution: Use CLO to compare insulation between fabrics and ensembles, then validate with real-world testing to avoid over- or underestimating warmth.

Mistake 2: Ignoring fit and movement effects

Rationale: Air gaps, seam placements, and body movement dramatically affect warmth. A garment with a high CLO value in the lab may feel different in motion. Solution: Always test ensembles in dynamic conditions and record fit notes alongside CLO estimates.

Mistake 3: Over-reliance on a single CLO figure

Rationale: Conditions vary by climate, humidity, and activity. A single CLO target cannot cover all scenarios. Solution: Define CLO targets for multiple use cases (e.g., sedentary indoor, moderate outdoor, active cold-weather) and carry out separate validations for each.

Mistake 4: Confusing CLO with tog or R-values

Rationale: Different fields use related but distinct metrics. Mixing tog (a separate unit) with CLO can lead to misinterpretation. Solution: Use CLO for clothing insulation comparisons, while using appropriate equivalents for other applications, and clearly document the conversion methods.

Mistake 5: Underestimating moisture and sweat effects

Rationale: Moisture dramatically alters warmth performance. Testing in dry conditions may overestimate CLO performance in real use. Solution: Include moisture and perspiration considerations in your CLO calculations and plan for breathability in your designs.

Mistake 6: Skipping validation with real users

Rationale: Lab data can diverge from field experience. Solution: Conduct wear trials with representative users and collect both subjective feedback and objective CLO proxies.

Mistake 7: Underfunding CLO testing for production launches

Rationale: Skimping on CLO validation risks costly recalls or poor customer satisfaction. Solution: Budget for staged CLO testing and partner with labs that can scale with product lines as you grow.

Mistake 8: Neglecting seasonality and layering dynamics

Rationale: Warmth needs change with seasons; layering strategies affect the effective CLO. Solution: Plan CLO targets by season and include a robust layering guide in your product specs.

Expert insider tips

  • Build a CLO-focused decision tree for product development to accelerate choices from fiber to finish.
  • Stay current with 2024–2025 advances in fabric technology, such as high-loft composites and breathable membranes, to improve warmth per CLO unit.
  • Use predictive modeling to forecast CLO outcomes before prototypes, saving time and reducing material waste.
  • Communicate CLO targets clearly to customers with simple charts showing which garments contribute most to warmth.
  • For manufacturing partners, request CLO data sheets with traceable test methods to ensure consistency across lots.

Advanced Techniques and Best Practices

For experienced designers and engineers, CLO value becomes a precision tool in an advanced workflow. You can leverage formal testing, data analytics, and modern manufacturing approaches to push warmth efficiency further in 2025. Key ideas include dynamic CLO calculations that account for climate variability, moisture cycling, and movement. In addition, you can combine CLO data with computational textile design to optimize insulation while reducing bulk and weight. By adopting this approach, you gain better control over warmth, comfort, and cost per garment.

Industry trends you can exploit include modular layering systems, where each layer has a defined CLO contribution and breathability target. Using 3D body scanning and simulation, you can tailor CLO targets to specific body shapes, ensuring consistent warmth across sizes. AI-based prediction can help you estimate CLO values from fabric features such as fiber composition, weave density, and finishing treatments. This enables rapid design iterations and faster time to market. Two practical tips: (1) document CLO targets in a living product database and (2) validate evolving CLO predictions with real-world wear tests to guard against drift in production quality. These best practices align with the latest guidelines for 2024–2025, ensuring your warmth strategy stays current.

In addition, stay mindful of location-based considerations. If you’re manufacturing in China or another major textile hub, CLO data helps you communicate warmth performance with buyers and retailers. You can reference local testing facilities and production standards to reassure stakeholders. For instance, when you offer customization, you can present CLO-targeted options and explain how adjustments to fabric weight or layering impact total warmth. The combination of precision CLO management and transparent supply chain communication strengthens your value proposition in a competitive market.

Conclusion

In summary, the CLO value is a practical, standardized way to quantify warmth in clothing and insulated textiles. By understanding that 1 CLO ≈ 0.155 m²K/W and recognizing how layering, fit, and moisture influence the effective CLO, you gain a clear framework for designing, testing, and marketing warm garments. You can compare fabrics with confidence, select optimal layering strategies, and validate warmth in both lab and real-world settings. The CLO value becomes a shared language that connects fabric science, product design, and consumer comfort—driving better outcomes for customers and stronger results for manufacturers.

As you move from theory to practice, integrate CLO value into your product briefs, testing plans, and production specifications. Use CLO-guided decisions to optimize warmth without unnecessary bulk or cost. If you’re seeking a trusted partner to tailor CLO-driven solutions for your next apparel line, consider engaging with a dedicated manufacturer capable of custom clothing design and testing. We can help you shape fabrics, cut patterns, and finishing processes to achieve the precise CLO targets you need. To discuss your project or request a custom CLO-focused solution, contact us today. Contact us for custom clothing.

Key learnings you take away include:

  • How CLO value translates to practical warmth in different environments
  • How to plan fabrics and layering to achieve target CLO values
  • How to validate warmth through lab tests and real-world testing
  • How to communicate CLO-based warmth metrics to customers and partners

With CLO value as your compass, you’ll design and deliver garments that are truly warm, comfortable, and suited to the needs of 2025 consumers and manufacturers alike. For ongoing guidance and collaboration opportunities, reach out and start the conversation about CLO-driven warmth optimization today.